With the U.S. Supreme Court expected to address campaign finance reform in its next term, new research from Christopher Cotton, an assistant professor of economics, offers fresh insight on the issue. The study uses game theory to compare two reform options: contribution limits and taxing campaign contributions. His conclusion? Taxing campaign contributions is the better solution. The research is published in the August issue of the Journal of Public Economics.Link to working paper version or final version on journal website.
Showing posts with label signaling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label signaling. Show all posts
Sunday, August 16, 2009
should we tax or cap political contributions?
In the spirit of unabashed self-promotion, here is a summary of some of my own research, as it appeared in the University of Miami B-School Buzz:
Wednesday, June 10, 2009
parents, child self confidence, and child performance
In a recent paper, Rajeev Darolia (George Washington) and Bruce Wydick (U San Francisco) test how parents can affect the academic effort and performance of a child through "signals," such as praise or financial rewards. From the abstract:
Our results show that some complementary actions before college, such as parental praise, foster academic achievement above what natural ability would predict. Conversely, we find that some substitutionary actions before college, e.g. providing cars as gifts, are associated with lower effort in college and underachievement.I was particularly amused by the car-buying result. The article is forthcoming in Economica. Link to it here, or here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)